Motion to impeach a High Court judge

A six-member delegation of Opposition MPs in Rajya Sabha handed over a motion seeking impeachment of Allahabad High Court Judge Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav, to secretary general of the upper house on December 13, 2024.

Constitutional Provisions Governing Removal of Judges

  • Article 124(4):
    • Applicable to Supreme Court judges, it requires:
      • Proved misbehavior or incapacity as grounds for removal.
      • An impeachment motion in each House of Parliament should be supported by:
        • A majority of the total membership of both Houses.
        • At least two-thirds of the members present and voting in both Houses.
    • This procedure ensures a high threshold, safeguarding judicial independence.
  • Article 217(1)(b) and Article 218:
    • Extend the provisions of Article 124(4) and 124(5) to High Court judges. It means a High Court judge can be removed in a similar way to a Supreme Court judge.
    • Removal is effected by the President following the parliamentary procedure.

Procedure Under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

  • Initiation:
    • A motion requires:
      • At least 100 Lok Sabha members or 50 Rajya Sabha members to sign.
    • Once introduced, the Speaker or Chairman constitutes a three-member inquiry committee.
  • Inquiry Committee Composition:
    • Chaired by the Chief Justice of India or a Supreme Court judge.
    • Includes a High Court Chief Justice and a distinguished jurist.
  • Inquiry and Outcome:
    • The committee investigates and submits a report.
    • If the judge is found not guilty, the matter ends.
    • If guilty, the motion proceeds to Parliament for debate and voting.
  • Parliamentary Vote:
    • Requires a majority of the total membership and a two-thirds majority of those present and voting in both Houses during the same session.
  • Presidential Order:
    • If both Houses pass the motion, the President issues an order for removal.

Past Impeachment Cases

None of the six attempts at impeaching a judge since Independence have been successful. Only in two instances — involving Justices Ramaswami and Sen — have the committees of inquiry returned a guilty finding.

  • Justice V. Ramaswami (1993):
    • First impeachment proceedings against a Supreme Court judge for financial impropriety.
    • Motion failed despite a guilty committee finding, as Congress MPs abstained.
  • Justice Soumitra Sen (2011):
    • Found guilty of financial misappropriation by the inquiry committee.
    • Rajya Sabha passed the motion, but Justice Sen resigned before Lok Sabha could act, rendering the proceedings moot.

Written by 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *